Don’t Develop Your Products Naked
Entrepreneurs Learn Why Nothing Proves A Market Like
Customers
Paul Finke’s
5 Keys To Sizing Up Markets
Serial entrepreneur Paul Finke
is a veteran of five technology startups. When
validating a market opportunity, here are the first
five things he considers:
1.
Understand the need. How cool
your product is doesn’t matter, the question is:
Who needs what you're selling? First
describe that, then determine how big the need is.
2. Who is
the customer and how do you get to them? The
potential of a market is only as good as the
percentage that is addressable. Determine who
actually says yes to the purchase decision and what
channels you’ll need to reach them.
3. Define
the value proposition. Explain
it in terms of your customer using the language they
use.
4. How
will you make a profit? Even big
markets aren’t attractive if they have ultra-thin
margins.
5.
Sustainable advantage. What are
the barriers to entry that will stop someone from
copying you and stealing all of your business? |
(Washington,
DC -- May 30, 2002) “It's
very, very important not to develop a product naked,”
cautions Tim Meyers, General Partner at Updata
Venture Partners.
What does that mean? Whether
you’re at the earliest stages of defining your market
opportunity or the later stages of product development,
you need the cover of customer involvement and guidance if
you expect any chance of success.
Serial entrepreneur Paul Finke
put it another way. When it comes to determining a
market’s potential, most people start with analyst
reports, “Since, by definition, every forecast is wrong,
you have all the analysts charts on the wall and none of
them converge. The best thing to do is to talk to
customers. Go out and try to get somebody to say, ‘If
you made this thing, I would buy it.’”
Meyers and Finke were members of
a panel at this morning’s Netpreneur Coffee &
DoughNets meeting assembled to discuss “Sizing And
Validating Market Opportunities,” including Clara Conti,
CEO of ObjectVideo, Jonathan Silver, Managing
Director of venture investing firm Core
Capital Partners, and moderator Andrew Sherman, author
and Senior Partner at McDermott, Will & Emery. Joined by
Mario Morino, Chairman of the Morino Institute, who
provided a wrap-up to the session, the speakers provided a
wealth of practical tips and suggestions to help
entrepreneurs determine the market viability for their
business ideas. One primary message came through above all
others, however: Talk to your customers.
“There is only one way I know
to validate a market,” said Silver, “whether someone
says they will buy your product.”
Answering whether or not a market
is attractive starts with a much more subjective question:
attractive to whom? If just yourself, a personal
passion may be much more important than market size. On
the other hand, venture capitalists will expect much
bigger (and clearer) potential than “lifestyle
entrepreneurs” who are simply looking for enough returns
to live at a certain level with appropriate financial
freedom.
Either way, of course, you’ll
eventually have to quantify, subdivide, and strategize,
and at the center of that process should be the customer.
As Morino put it, nothing replaces “a compelling
knowledge of your space” earned by building
relationships and working in the trenches. Silver advised,
“You want to do at least as
much research as we [investors] are going to do, and we
will be talking to 20, 30, 40, 50 potential customers
about your product. You ought to be doing at least the
same.”
In addition to differentiating between lifestyle or
growth goals, an entrepreneur has to be able to quantify
the total market versus addressable market (the portion of
the market you can actually reach), the potential growth
of the market versus the potential growth in your share of
the market, current targets versus expansion markets, and
the opportunity in your niche versus that in your entire
sector. This involves knowing elements such as demographics, pricing, and
competitive analysis, and should incorporate as much
direct customer contact as possible at all stages, through
prototyping, product testing, and beyond.
Take
ObjectVideo for example, which learned that market
validation isn’t just a startup function. Founded during
the Internet heyday as Diamondback Vision offering MPEG4 streaming media technology, Conti
explained how the company soon realized that it could not
compete against industry giants like Microsoft and Real
Networks. Management set off on a project to identify
other spaces where their object recognition technology
could find a more hospitable reception. The founders had
originally come from the Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency (DARPA) and so had previous knowledge and
experience in the government and security spaces. Through
extensive conversations with people in the market (and
before the September 11 attacks) they began to see an
opportunity in transportation security which the company
is now pursuing. Importantly, although executives have
identified several vertical sectors that might use their
solutions, they are keeping focused on transportation the
near term. That’s important because your organization
has to scale appropriately with your markets.
While
sizing a market will take more than anecdotal
conversations, the speakers advised care when using
broader, indirect, or external sources such as analysts
and survey results. Not that they don’t have their
place, but they must be used appropriately. As Morino put
it, “I think
[traditional market research techniques] have confused
more people than they’ve helped. It's not that market
research isn't good — it's fundamentally very good —
but we tend not to interpret and integrate it very
well.”
One of the biggest problems with
market research, he said, is that it tends to focus you on
short-term issues, not the broader analytics of the long
term. Silver was even more direct about the use of analyst
projections, “I don’t care about your market size projections three or four years
out. Working in the areas we do it's
hard enough to figure out where the market will be 18
months from now. I give very little credence to deep
analysis of the number of units that will be sold of a
disruptive technology four years out the door.”
The advice of financial analysts
may have been even more damaging to some companies (and
investors) during the Internet bubble period. “In the
last two or three years,” said Meyers, “A lot of
people defined their companies based on what Merrill Lynch
or Goldman Sachs or Morgan Stanley said about particular
markets—that
revenues really didn't matter, that this was a market that
was growing. Revenues do matter.” For passionate
entrepreneurs, the focus should be in the entrance, not
the exit, strategy.
In his wrap-up, Morino recalled a
recent effort by one venture capital firm to review its
portfolio companies over the last 20 years to see what the
successes (and failures) had in common. It came to two
things: quality of management and markets. “No,” said
one of the firm’s managing partners, “Remove markets.
Good management avoids bad markets.”
Asked to name some of the markets
of current investment interest to Core Capital Partners,
Silver counted off high-tech sectors such a security,
nanotechnology, and bioinformatics, but he was quick to
qualify the list, saying “Anything is an opportunity if
you have a better product at a cheaper price.”
“Just remember,” Meyers
cautioned, “That “better,” “faster,” and
“cheaper” have to be determined by the customer.”
Copyright
2002, Morino Institute. All rights reserved.
|
|